in Search
Welcome to Neopoleon - Sign in | Join | Help
Navigation: Home | Forums | Galleries

Snubbed by a Fellow Countryman

Portland is a small city. It used to be tiny.

You can walk from one end of the so called “city center” to the other in under twenty minutes, and you can do it without getting mugged or seeing a single violent crime committed. Except for a couple thirty floor jobs, the buildings are short and squat, so you never lose daylight (unless you’re walking through the city at night, but you know what I mean).

Over the past fifteen years, Portland has gone from being a sort of modern ghost town to being a thriving, artsy-fartsy, pretension-filled Up and Comer. Our art museum was just renovated, and we’ve had, like, famous people take the stage at our theater (surely you remember “Marine #7” from episode 63 of “Two Dads and a Talking Sausage” – he played a potted plant on the set of the Portland Senior Brigade’s abridged production of Hamlet – it was a gala event, attended by only the wealthiest and most powerful people of the city, such as the manager for Smidley’s Gardening Supplies and his exotic lover, Jennifer).

As native Portlanders have watched their city get overrun by retiring southern Californians and traffic weary Seattleites, they’ve grown pissier and pissier about people they perceive to be Outsiders.

A Portland native, by the by, is one of the indigenous peoples of the Portland area. The indigenous peoples of Portland, in case you were wondering, are defined as being “Anybody who moved here before you.”

There was a law passed, or something, that requires any Portland native take on an air of superiority over his recently acquired Californian transplants, and to always express a sense of entitlement to the area that we stole fair and square from the Native Americans who were here first (“Hey, guys – have some blankets…”).

One problem that Portlanders face in applying this deserved snobbery is that it’s actually really hard to tell the difference between a Californian and a Portlander just by appearances. If you have a finely tuned sense of “ugly” then you can typically spot a Portlander from a mile away, but most Portlanders, probably due to repeated exposure to the stimulus in question, have lost a keen understanding of “ugly” the way a pig is immune to the smell of its own feces.

Portlanders have, therefore, fallen back on some other important signs that someone might be from Someplace Else, and perhaps hasn’t been here for the requisite three weeks that allows someone to claim native status.

One of the most telling signs of a foreigner around here is use of an umbrella. It rains in Portland the way it hots in Death Valley. It just doesn’t let up.

Now, I don’t really care much about fitting in, and I think that getting rained on because social pressures encourage me to enjoy it is a pretty stupid thing. When it pours, I use an umbrella.

People have commented before on this. I’m asked if I’m from out of town, or, get this, why I don’t like the rain. I don’t understand what it is that makes people ask me why I don’t like the rain. It’s very simple. I don’t like the rain because it’s wet. Hello-o-o-o…

The reason I’m writing about this is that I was asked again today if I’m from out of town (note that I’m sugar coating this – I wasn’t so much asked if I was from out of town as much as someone accused me of being a non-native - this is one of the highest forms of insult that a Portlander can unleash, aside from marrying your sister).

I explained that I wasn’t from out of town, and that I didn’t particularly like the rain because, like I mentioned a few sentences back, the stuff has a tendency to get things wet.

The response? Something about “liquid sunshine” and how Portlanders enjoy the rain.

I just don’t understand this. It makes me want to scream.

It’s like saying, “Hey – me ‘n the boys were wondering – you’re from Rwanda – so you must enjoy violent political insurgency, right?”

The answer would most likely be an emphatic “No.”

What I’m trying to say is, if you’re one of these Portland natives who doesn’t understand why someone would want to use an umbrella, and if you feel disgusted by the sight of someone using one, and if you feel the need to submit unsolicited comments on the matter, then, and I’m sorry for the strong language, you’re a pudding-head.

Yes. I mean it.

Pudding-head.

You.

Published Thursday, November 03, 2005 9:24 PM by Rory

Filed Under:

Comments

 

Clock Punsher said:

Of Course I am going to comment!!!!!

Yes, I am a native. Yes That is native to Oregon. Not only, am I a native (born here), but my father is, his father is too and also the 2 fathers beyound on that. Can you say "Wagon Train ho!!! we're moving to Oregon!!!". Mine was the 3rd family to settle in the Hillsboro area (Roy). So, if that does not make as Oregon native as one can be, then I don't know what does.. Myself, I welcome the influx. I welcome the dorks that move here and buy all sorts of gortex to fit in. I welcome all of those people who move here because they want to be outdoorsy. I welcome all of the drivers who think that rain = 25 mph on the freeway and that hydroplanning warrents uneeded braking. To the people who moved here from the south, welcome. The summers are great and the winters are wet. we hope you like the wet. To those from the north, welcome. We hope that you do not laugh too hard when the whole state shuts down because of 2 inches of snow that melts by noon.... Why do I welcome these people. Becasue I don't care. Portland is great city. why not live here? If you think this is crowded, take the weekend and go to Seattle..

IF you moved here to get away from it all, guess what, so did everyone else.

Thanks and have a wet day...
November 3, 2005 9:57 PM
 

Adam said:

I'm a native Seattlite whose recently been converted to the midwest.

One of the things I like about Chicago is that everyone carries an umbrella and are not ashamed to use them. It doesn't rain as much here as it does in the Northwest but when it does, it tends to really come down.

People here really embrace the weather. In the winter, people dress up in fancy coats, scarfs, gloves and furry hats and walk around in it. When it rains, they break out the goloshes umbrellas and ponchos. When it begins to warm up after the long winter (you know - 59F or so in May) it's back to polo shirts with short sleeves.

As bad as the weather is here, people willingly spend a lot of time in it and not as much cooped up in the car - it's kind of nice.

November 3, 2005 10:14 PM
 

Charlie said:

Rory,
I am totaly confused with your meaning of takening time off. This is like your 5th post in the last week.

Maybe you should stick to your word and just take some time off from everything that you do not have to do.

It's good to see that you are in better form though
November 3, 2005 11:08 PM
 

Aaron Jensen said:

Sorry, Rory, but you are a Portland Freak. Maybe you have more wrong with you? I suggest you go see a professional quickly. If you live in Portland, and are a native nonetheless, you must, must, must like the rain. Nay, you must love the rain. If not, then you just need to take your show to California.

I know that I am a Portland native when I get excited down here in So-Cal when it stays overcast for a couple of days. I actually miss the rain. A couple of years ago, there was a winter where it just didn't rain. I can't tell you how mad I was.

Next thing you know, you'll be telling me you didn't like Star Wars: Episode III: Revenge of the Poopypants! You're a monster!
November 4, 2005 12:44 AM
 

paul said:

"It rains in Portland the way it hots in Death Valley."

I don't why but that phrase is the most clever thing I've heard in like a month.

November 4, 2005 1:13 AM
 

Greg said:

Hah. Right-freakin-on dude.
November 4, 2005 6:05 AM
 

Rich C said:

Sorry, but me too, Rory... I'm in the Love Rain camp. On a day like today, I even turn my face skyward to get just a bit more down my shirt.

Don't forget: the rain helps wash a lot of filth from the street and from some of the "Dirty People Anonymous" crowd(http://neopoleon.com/blog/posts/396.aspx).

Enjoy it! :-)
November 4, 2005 7:00 AM
 

Anonymous said:

Umm, did you just admit to carrying an umbrella? Why don't you just pack up and go back to California.

Actually funny that you bring this up; I was just walking through the park blocks today noting how few people were carrying umbrellas, and how many other people were obviously proud of not doing so.
November 4, 2005 7:15 AM
 

Chris said:

Urm.. proud? To NOT have an umbrella? Proud that you didn't see the weather forecast or proud that you are a chump that likes being soaked?

So portlanders would recommend people in Winnipeg to not wear warm cloathing in -40c ("white floaty sunshine") and aussies to not wear sun block ("radioactive sunshine sunshine") eh?

I live in England. One of the things they are expert at here is crappy weather. Summers are wet, winters are wet and we get wet in between. People use umbrellas. See the British are known for crappy weather but not lack of sense most of the time.
November 4, 2005 2:34 PM
 

Websteria said:

You know what's funny? I moved up here from San Diego (my blog chronicles the story) and I've found the people here to be fairly understanding.

Most think I moved up here for a job, which I didn't. I moved up here because I was tired of the same boring mild weather year in and year out (I lived there for 27 years). I enjoy the weather here, the rain, the seasonal changes... it's at least something comparitively.

I feel bad for the native oregonians who are being forced out of the real estate market due to rising house prices, I know how you feel. I was forced out of San Diego for a similar reason, but unfortunatly there's nothing that can be done about it. Resentment will not make it better. The right thing to do is to learn to live with your new neighbors. They're not going anywhere....
November 4, 2005 4:30 PM
 

John said:

I am a Native to Oregon and grew up in the Willamette Valley. My family lived in the Pacific Northwest for years and many of them still do.

I love the lush green forest and the mountains. I love going to the beach and watching water pummel the rock ledges and shoot water 50 feet or higher in the air. I do not enjoy long rainy winters. I was very depressed as a child. Never seeing the Sun was not healthy for me.

After 16 years of it, my Dad got a job in Florida and the whole family moved. Wow, what a change that was. I went from seeing the Sun less then 30 days a year to seeing the sun every day except less then 30 days a year. After two years though, I moved back to the Pacific Northwest. I missed the green forest and mountains. I liked seeing an ocean that had real waves all year long instead of only during a hurricane.

I have a new perspective of being an Oregonian. It is okay to have an umbrella and use it. It is okay to also get away and get some solid sunshine. Oregonians can get a little crazy after not having a lot of Sun time. Please excuse them and suggest that they take a sabbatical to a sunny place. Maybe they too will have your wisdom to take an umbrella and use it.

Thanks for the post.
November 4, 2005 8:40 PM
 

paul said:

The Native Oregonians haven't gone anywhere;

Confederated Tribes of Coos Lower Umpqua
& Suislaw Indians
455 South 4th St.
Coos Bay, OR 97420

Coquille Indian Tribe Siletz Agency
P.O. Box 1435
Coos Bay, OR 97420

Cow Creek Band of Umpqua Indians
2400 Stewart Parkway #300
Roseburg, OR 97470

Grande Ronde Indian Community
Confederated Tribes of the Grande Ronde Council
9615 Grand Ronde Rd.
Grande Ronde, OR 97347

Klamath Reservation Klamath General Council
P.O. Box 436
Chiloquin, OR 97624

Siletz Reservation Siletz Tribal Council
P.O. Box 549
Siletz, OR 97380

Umatilla Reservation
P.O. Box 638
Pendleton, OR 97801

Warm Springs Reservation
P.O. Box C, 1233 Veteran St.
Warm Springs, OR 97761

Happy Thanksgivig!



November 5, 2005 1:06 AM
 

MtHoodlum said:

I'm from Portland (yeah, yeah, whatever) and I never used an umbrella growing up, it always seemed like an e useless item to keep track of. But there are three reasons I would use an umbrella now:

1. I wear nicer clothes to work and I have to stay there, in those clothes, for 8 hours.
2. I traveled to a place where umbrellas are common (Japan) and can now appreciate their utility.
3. This last week has been a kick in the crotch. I walked by a dead otter yesterday, presumably drowned.
November 5, 2005 8:18 AM
 

Scott Hanselman said:

My grandmother was born here. I'm as Native as one can be. Not only do I NOT use an umbrella in Portland, I don't even use a jacket. I walked around the Home Depot parking lot in a soaked Polo shirt today just to stay Portlandy. Big ups to P-town.

Here's a little secret. I use Umbrellas in all other cities.

All that said, man up Rory, get your hair wet.
November 5, 2005 9:47 AM
 

Tim said:

Clock Punsher, were you intimating that one of your ancestors was a "Wagon Train ho"? That's a little too much info, keep it to yourself.
November 5, 2005 5:17 PM
 

Old bee-bee dueling buddy said:

Development of West Berlin is great as long as it stays in West Berlin. All of this Native & Non-Native stuff is fine and natural as long as Portland stays Socialist and financially accomodates for everyone. Even for the pretentious snobby natives who lived by the Fred Meyers far, far on the out skirts of SW Stumpy-doo. snap.
November 7, 2005 8:05 AM
 

Jacob said:

Rory, are you sure that the fellow in question was not simply a bit soused? Isn't "liquid sunshine" simply a euphemism for alcohol? Perhaps he was saying that when it rains, he has a few drinks and feels a lot better.
November 8, 2005 1:16 AM
 

Ammiss said:

I am a native to northwest Oregon and love the rain. I do not like umbrellas for good reason. I think they are selfish; it dribbles water on the person standing next to them and I can't count how many times I have been poked on the head by someone else's umbrella as they bob and spin around walking or standing with apparently no regard for anyone else around them.

I would much rather be labeled a silly-rain-loving-Portlander than a selfish-asshole-umbrella-user.

So there.
November 9, 2005 12:18 AM
 

apes-ma said:

"Urm.. proud? To NOT have an umbrella? Proud that you didn't see the weather forecast or proud that you are a chump that likes being soaked? "

So the only options are umbrella, or get wet? How 'bout a nice jacket with a hood. Takes up less sidewalk space, and you are less likely to leave it on the bus, your shi-shi friend's Pearl District loft, or have to carry it around the recently rennovated Masonic Temple cum art museum.

Hoods don't usually invert in a strong wind, and when they poke people in the eye it's surreal rather than painful. I'm with Ammiss, Minus the asshole insult.

Doesn't matter to me whether you're from Drain, or Durango, like the rain or detest the endless grey lid of a sky. Umbrellas are a nuisance.

November 11, 2005 6:35 PM
 

Steven Gilmer said:

I posted a few notes from the SQL 2005 seminar for my network and one of the programmers named Kirk had the additional brief questions. Can someone please e-mail me a few brief answers if they know them? Thanks :-)

***************

One of the big differences with SQL 2005 is that users are not assigned permissions to the database – schemas are. This change alone merits a thorough testing of applications that now run on SQL 2000.
[Kirk Heughens] How do you suggest we test the upgrades?



In SQL 2005 multiple file groups are used so that if one physical location goes down only one file group will go down. Restores can thus be “piecemeal” and be completed faster.
[Kirk Heughens] How do this change under Indigo?



In an upgrade scenario the speed of the upgrade will be dependant on the number of ‘objects’ not the size of the database. This is because of the mete data associated with each object.
[Kirk Heughens] Where is the Mete data stored?



Indexing can be implemented while the database is live and it will not become “locked” so that indexing is in real time. (alter index)
[Kirk Heughens] Does this include primary indexes or only secondary indexes?



Failover clustering is robust in SQL 2005 as is database mirroring. Eight node clusters are possible in SQL 2005. Mount points are supported for clustering so the limit of the logical cluster is defined by the extra 25 drive letters of the alphabet. Mirroring will become available in early 2006.
[Kirk Heughens] Are there any issues currently outstanding that pertain to clustering SQL 2005 servers?



A mirrored site does not need a license for the mirror until it comes on line.
[Kirk Heughens] When is the license purchased? Is this a honesty thing?



SQL 2005 supports AWE for better memory utilization.
[Kirk Heughens] Please explain AWE and its benefits...



Restores are much faster since in the timeline a “re-do” restore of the online database is accomplished first after which an “un-do” restore is completed on the rest of the database. Thus a full restore is much faster than one in SQL 2000.
[Kirk Heughens] Could you supply some actual performance numbers in minutes 2000 vs. 2005?



There are two types of mirroring that was discussed. Synchronous and ‘High Availability’ which requires a ‘Witness’ (another piece of hardware).
[Kirk Heughens] Could you please explain the benefits and advantages of both and why you would choose one over the other?



Bi-directional replication of data is possible for remote sites on a peer to peer set up. This would be peer to peer replication.
[Kirk Heughens] This is a very interesting concept; however, how is the data integrity ensured?



Data ownership is purely logical and does not resolve conflicts.
[Kirk Heughens] Please elaborate....



Log shipping can be accomplished to multiple sites.
[Kirk Heughens] Good to know.



It was demonstrated that when setting up a partner for mirroring either a command line or the wizard can be used to accomplish the exact same thing. The new SQL Management Studio was used to fire up the wizard.



By comparison SQL 6.5 could process 6,500 transactions per minute.

SQL 2005 can process one million transactions per minute.



For some reason the Intel ‘Montecedo’ processor chip which is dual core and multi thread capable was given high marks when used with SQL 2005.
[Kirk Heughens] Can we find out more information? Does Microsoft recommend use of this chip?



As mentioned Schemas own objects in SQL 2005 not users. The rights to a database does not give rights to the mete data.



Schemas can be assigned to different users for distributed rights.



Hot Add memory is supported for SQL 2005.
[Kirk Heughens] How is this accomplished at the hardware level?



DTS is NOT supported on a 64 bit implementation of SQL 2005.
[Kirk Heughens] I would assume SSIS is supported on the 64bit platform?



Mail services (service broker) uses SMTP so that no ‘mail’ is lost.
[Kirk Heughens] So "POP3" is no longer supported?



XML is now native to SQL 2005.
[Kirk Heughens] XML was suppose to be supported in 2000. Can you explain/elaborate on the differences between how SQL 2000 support XML and XML is now native in SQL 2005 ?



You can write in either T-SQL or SQLCLR. T_SQL comes with a SQL 2005 upgrade.
[Kirk Heughens] Is PL/SQL or SQL94 supported?



You can run a web service inside of a SQL 2005 server instance.
[Kirk Heughens] Very interesting. Does SQL 2005 run an internal IIS service? If not, please explain this architecture.





Steven Gilmer

Network Administration

(949) 474-4609

sgilmer@westernunited.com


December 13, 2005 8:07 PM
 

TrackBack said:

Tradeoffs
November 4, 2005 5:25 AM
New Comments to this post are disabled

About Rory

I *own* this site, you loser.