in Search
Welcome to Neopoleon - Sign in | Join | Help
Navigation: Home | Forums | Galleries

A little nothing

It’s Saturday, and I have to go make lunch, so I’m going to be busy for a while, but I just remembered something that I thunked last night while watching a commercial that aired during the latest episode of Battlestar Galactica.

It was a commercial for a charity that gave books to kids who “don’t have books at home.”

Here’s what I did thunk about it:

If there's a charity for kids who don't have books at home, and that charity gives books to those kids, and those kids keep those books at home, then isn't the charity putting itself out of business?

What’s more important? The cause or the charity? Are these kids selfishly accepting books at the expense of all the jobs provided by the charitable organization? Because, as I previously stated, these kids are putting the charity out of business by accepting the books. Once homes are stocked with books, we no longer need a charity which stocks homes with books.

Should there be a system of checks and balances to ensure that this fragile ecosystem isn’t disrupted? Should there be another charitable organization that works to remove the books from the homes of these children? Would that provide the balance needed?

And, if this extra organization were to exist, then would it be helping the first charitable organization, or would it be helping the kids? Because, in removing the books from the homes, it would be:

1. Helping the first charitable organization to survive by giving it work to do

2. Helping the children by ensuring that the first charitable organization would always be around to provide books

Finally, if the net result is that we now have two healthy charitable organizations, both providing needed jobs, but leaving the children with roughly as many books as they would have had without the organizations, then is it wise to keep those organizations around?

Or would it be cruel to shut them both down? Cruel because:

1. It would destroy the created jobs

2. It would send a message to the children that they don’t matter

Discuss amongst yourselves. I’m going to go microwave myself a burrito.

Published Saturday, January 07, 2006 8:16 PM by Rory

Filed Under: ,

Comments

 

Andy said:

Or the charitable organization that puts books in children's homes could pull double duty and remove those books from the children's homes. That way, the organization would always have a steady supply of books which they're removing from children's homes which they had placed books in. Maybe they could even come up with a system to keep track of which homes have which books and set a time limit for how long those childrens homes can have books. Maybe two weeks? They could call it a library or something stupid like that.

`Andy
January 7, 2006 10:33 PM
 

Alastair said:

Doesn't something like that already exist called a "Library". IMHO.
January 7, 2006 10:36 PM
 

Rory said:

Andy -

"They could call it a library or something stupid like that."

Your idea is too complicated, and would never work in real life.

Sorry.
January 7, 2006 10:37 PM
 

Walter Lounsbery said:

For the sake of efficiency, the paper books should be eliminated from the system. The children should be issued little electronic books. We would call them Readers and maybe have some Japanese company make them. The Japanese would then encode the real books into electronic files. The files would be specially encoded so we could take back the books later. That would be controlled by the Digital Records Management system, or DRM.

But your question was, should we shut down the Reader makers and the DRM. Maybe we should. Then the kids could go back to doing what they really love, downloading music and listening to that. Oh yeah, that takes another charity that gives away iPods...
January 8, 2006 1:29 AM
 

Ian said:

BSG is looking good for this season no? The first episode showed a fair bit of promise I thought. these first few episodes may well be called "the trials of Starbuck"..

January 8, 2006 4:24 AM
 

Rory said:

Ian -

"BSG is looking good for this season no?"

It's getting harder and harder for me to tell. I admit that my expectations were exceedingly high - having been set by the first 1.5 seasons.

I wasn't floored by last night's episode, but I also wasn't floored by the first couple episodes of season two. The storyline had to pick up and get going before it drew me in.

My problem right now is that this new admiral is just a bit too evil - while I realize that parts of the show require a suspension of disbelief (you know - robots, spaceships, and other things), they've done such a good job on creating *real* characters, rather than just types, that this new admiral woman seems rather shallow. Like she was thrown in for some drama.

In fact, just about everybody on the Pegasus seems like a character type rather than a real person with real thoughts. It ordinarily wouldn't be so obvious, but since the rest of the show is done so well... it shows.

The quality is a little too mixed right now. It's like drinking warm champagne through a straw.

I'm hoping the rest of the season is better.
January 8, 2006 4:47 AM
 

Ammiss said:

So, have you thought that way about all charities? Are you saying that we should not completely eliminate poverty because it would put the corresponding charities out of business? hmm...but then would those emplyees need assistance so the charity would simply restaff with others and perpetuate itself with it's own employees?

Hmmm (uttered while holding my chin between fist and thumb, eyes directed upward)... very interesting post.
January 8, 2006 7:19 AM
 

Rory said:

Ammiss -

"Are you saying that we should not completely eliminate poverty because it would put the corresponding charities out of business?"

To be honest, I don't actually know what I was thinking :)

Just a little fun...
January 8, 2006 8:11 AM
 

J said:

This reminds me very much of the Little Britain skit. The office building of the cancer society recieves a phone call to be told that a cure for cancer has been found.

Much joy and happiness erupts in the office until the employees realise what the news means for their careers and earnings in the near future.

Soon after, the office recieves another call to let them know that the cure hasn't been found, and that that it was merely a false alarm. The workers feign sadness as they stop packing their belongings into boxes.
January 8, 2006 9:03 AM
 

Ammiss said:

Rory -

"To be honest, I don't actually know what I was thinking :)

Just a little fun..."

Yes, yes, I know. I was having fun back. Apparently my response didn't translate well without the tone inflections of oral communication. Bummer. Well, maybe next time. :)
January 8, 2006 3:00 PM
 

Ian said:

"My problem right now is that this new admiral is just a bit too evil"

I know what you mean, I did wonder if she was in fact a Cylon..
January 8, 2006 7:25 PM
 

IHateGrapes said:

I don't think the charity is in trouble. They probably only use 1% of each donation to actually buy books and those are probably just dropped in the dumpster behind the headquarters (not unlike Publisher's Clearing House entries).

Then again, this could just be a front for the Book-Of-The-Month club. They buy the first book for a 'family in need' using charitable donations and then sue them when they fail to meet their contractual obligation (once again, making them a 'family in need'). There is beauty in symmetry!
January 10, 2006 6:10 PM
 

TKC said:

But isn't all charity's (or many health organization) main goal is to be rid of itself ?

January 11, 2006 4:37 PM
New Comments to this post are disabled

About Rory

I *own* this site, you loser.